Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Social Inequality: Social inequality in perceived oral health among adults in Australia

Identifieur interne : 007905 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 007904; suivant : 007906

Social Inequality: Social inequality in perceived oral health among adults in Australia

Auteurs : Anne E. Sanders [Australie] ; A. John Spencer [Australie]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:C19C75AF2CE955A7050632FAA76EAC08CB3BA5CE

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Objective: To establish population estimates of self‐assessed tooth loss and subjective oral health and describe the social distribution of these measures among dentate adults in Australia. Methods: Self‐report data were obtained from a nationally representative sample of 3,678 adults aged 18–91 years who participated in the 1999 National Dental Telephone Interview Survey and completed a subsequent mail survey. Oral health was evaluated using (1) self‐assessed tooth loss, (2) the 14‐item Oral Health Impact Profile, and (3) a global six‐point rating of oral health. Results: While the absolute difference in tooth loss across household income levels increased at each successive age group (18–44 years, 45–64 years, 65+ years) from 0.7 teeth to 6.1 teeth, the magnitude of the difference was approximately twofold at each age group. For subjective oral health measures, the magnitude of difference across income groups was most pronounced in the 18–44 years age group. In multivariate analysis, low household income, blue‐collar occupation, and high residential area disadvantage were positively associated with social impact from oral conditions and pathological tooth loss. Speaking other than English at home (relative to English), low household income (relative to high income), and vocational relative to tertiary education were each associated with more than twice the odds of poor self‐rated oral health. Conclusions: Significant social differentials in perceived oral health exist among dentate adults. Inequalities span the socio‐economic hierarchy. Implications: In addition to improving overall levels of oral health in the adult community, goals and targets should aim to reduce social inequalities in the distribution of outcomes.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2004.tb00930.x


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Social Inequality: Social inequality in perceived oral health among adults in Australia</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sanders, Anne E" sort="Sanders, Anne E" uniqKey="Sanders A" first="Anne E." last="Sanders">Anne E. Sanders</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Spencer, A John" sort="Spencer, A John" uniqKey="Spencer A" first="A. John" last="Spencer">A. John Spencer</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C19C75AF2CE955A7050632FAA76EAC08CB3BA5CE</idno>
<date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-842X.2004.tb00930.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C19C75AF2CE955A7050632FAA76EAC08CB3BA5CE/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">006031</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">006031</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">006031</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003164</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">003164</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1326-0200:2004:Sanders A:social:inequality:social</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">007A91</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">007905</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">007905</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">Social Inequality: Social inequality in perceived oral health among adults in Australia</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sanders, Anne E" sort="Sanders, Anne E" uniqKey="Sanders A" first="Anne E." last="Sanders">Anne E. Sanders</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country>Australie</country>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Australie-Méridionale</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:cityArea>Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Dental School, The University of Adelaide</wicri:cityArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country wicri:rule="url">Australie</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Spencer, A John" sort="Spencer, A John" uniqKey="Spencer A" first="A. John" last="Spencer">A. John Spencer</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country>Australie</country>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Australie-Méridionale</region>
</placeName>
<wicri:cityArea>Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Dental School, The University of Adelaide</wicri:cityArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">AUSTRALIAN NEW ZEALJOURNAL PUBLIC HEALTH</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1326-0200</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1753-6405</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">28</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="159">159</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="166">166</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">8</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2004-04">2004-04</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1326-0200</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">1326-0200</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Absolute difference</term>
<term>Adelaide</term>
<term>Adult access</term>
<term>Adults rating</term>
<term>Area disadvantage</term>
<term>Aust dent</term>
<term>Australian</term>
<term>Australian bureau</term>
<term>Australian health policy institute</term>
<term>Australian institute</term>
<term>Birth australia</term>
<term>Bivariate analysis</term>
<term>Caries experience</term>
<term>Community dent</term>
<term>Community dent health</term>
<term>Confidence intervals</term>
<term>Correlation analysis</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental care</term>
<term>Dental health</term>
<term>Dental patients</term>
<term>Dental school</term>
<term>Dental services</term>
<term>Dental statistics</term>
<term>Dentate</term>
<term>Dentate adults</term>
<term>Disadvantage</term>
<term>Disadvantaged adults</term>
<term>Disadvantaged groups</term>
<term>Educational attainment</term>
<term>Functional limitation</term>
<term>Global item</term>
<term>Greater odds</term>
<term>Greatest effect</term>
<term>Group figure</term>
<term>Group years years</term>
<term>Health differences</term>
<term>Health inequalities</term>
<term>Higher scores</term>
<term>Home english lote</term>
<term>Household income</term>
<term>Inequality</term>
<term>Lote</term>
<term>Lower response rates</term>
<term>Mail survey</term>
<term>Mental health</term>
<term>Multivariate analysis</term>
<term>Occupational group</term>
<term>Older adults</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral health impact profile</term>
<term>Oral health inequalities</term>
<term>Oral health measures</term>
<term>Oral health status</term>
<term>Population groups</term>
<term>Public health</term>
<term>Public health dent</term>
<term>Research series</term>
<term>Research unit</term>
<term>Sampling stratum</term>
<term>Signif icant</term>
<term>Social determinants</term>
<term>Social distribution</term>
<term>Social impact</term>
<term>Social impact scores</term>
<term>Social inequalities</term>
<term>Social inequality</term>
<term>Spencer article</term>
<term>Statistical significance</term>
<term>Telephone interview</term>
<term>Telephone interview survey</term>
<term>Tertiary education</term>
<term>Tooth loss</term>
<term>Weighted data</term>
<term>White collar</term>
<term>Zealand</term>
<term>Zealand journal</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Absolute difference</term>
<term>Adelaide</term>
<term>Adult access</term>
<term>Adults rating</term>
<term>Area disadvantage</term>
<term>Aust dent</term>
<term>Australian</term>
<term>Australian bureau</term>
<term>Australian health policy institute</term>
<term>Australian institute</term>
<term>Birth australia</term>
<term>Bivariate analysis</term>
<term>Caries experience</term>
<term>Community dent</term>
<term>Community dent health</term>
<term>Confidence intervals</term>
<term>Correlation analysis</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental care</term>
<term>Dental health</term>
<term>Dental patients</term>
<term>Dental school</term>
<term>Dental services</term>
<term>Dental statistics</term>
<term>Dentate</term>
<term>Dentate adults</term>
<term>Disadvantage</term>
<term>Disadvantaged adults</term>
<term>Disadvantaged groups</term>
<term>Educational attainment</term>
<term>Functional limitation</term>
<term>Global item</term>
<term>Greater odds</term>
<term>Greatest effect</term>
<term>Group figure</term>
<term>Group years years</term>
<term>Health differences</term>
<term>Health inequalities</term>
<term>Higher scores</term>
<term>Home english lote</term>
<term>Household income</term>
<term>Inequality</term>
<term>Lote</term>
<term>Lower response rates</term>
<term>Mail survey</term>
<term>Mental health</term>
<term>Multivariate analysis</term>
<term>Occupational group</term>
<term>Older adults</term>
<term>Oral health</term>
<term>Oral health impact profile</term>
<term>Oral health inequalities</term>
<term>Oral health measures</term>
<term>Oral health status</term>
<term>Population groups</term>
<term>Public health</term>
<term>Public health dent</term>
<term>Research series</term>
<term>Research unit</term>
<term>Sampling stratum</term>
<term>Signif icant</term>
<term>Social determinants</term>
<term>Social distribution</term>
<term>Social impact</term>
<term>Social impact scores</term>
<term>Social inequalities</term>
<term>Social inequality</term>
<term>Spencer article</term>
<term>Statistical significance</term>
<term>Telephone interview</term>
<term>Telephone interview survey</term>
<term>Tertiary education</term>
<term>Tooth loss</term>
<term>Weighted data</term>
<term>White collar</term>
<term>Zealand</term>
<term>Zealand journal</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Revenu des ménages</term>
<term>Santé mentale</term>
<term>Santé publique</term>
<term>Impact social</term>
<term>Inégalité sociale</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Objective: To establish population estimates of self‐assessed tooth loss and subjective oral health and describe the social distribution of these measures among dentate adults in Australia. Methods: Self‐report data were obtained from a nationally representative sample of 3,678 adults aged 18–91 years who participated in the 1999 National Dental Telephone Interview Survey and completed a subsequent mail survey. Oral health was evaluated using (1) self‐assessed tooth loss, (2) the 14‐item Oral Health Impact Profile, and (3) a global six‐point rating of oral health. Results: While the absolute difference in tooth loss across household income levels increased at each successive age group (18–44 years, 45–64 years, 65+ years) from 0.7 teeth to 6.1 teeth, the magnitude of the difference was approximately twofold at each age group. For subjective oral health measures, the magnitude of difference across income groups was most pronounced in the 18–44 years age group. In multivariate analysis, low household income, blue‐collar occupation, and high residential area disadvantage were positively associated with social impact from oral conditions and pathological tooth loss. Speaking other than English at home (relative to English), low household income (relative to high income), and vocational relative to tertiary education were each associated with more than twice the odds of poor self‐rated oral health. Conclusions: Significant social differentials in perceived oral health exist among dentate adults. Inequalities span the socio‐economic hierarchy. Implications: In addition to improving overall levels of oral health in the adult community, goals and targets should aim to reduce social inequalities in the distribution of outcomes.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Australie</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Australie-Méridionale</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Australie">
<region name="Australie-Méridionale">
<name sortKey="Sanders, Anne E" sort="Sanders, Anne E" uniqKey="Sanders A" first="Anne E." last="Sanders">Anne E. Sanders</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Sanders, Anne E" sort="Sanders, Anne E" uniqKey="Sanders A" first="Anne E." last="Sanders">Anne E. Sanders</name>
<name sortKey="Spencer, A John" sort="Spencer, A John" uniqKey="Spencer A" first="A. John" last="Spencer">A. John Spencer</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 007905 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 007905 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:C19C75AF2CE955A7050632FAA76EAC08CB3BA5CE
   |texte=   Social Inequality: Social inequality in perceived oral health among adults in Australia
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022